Skip to main content

The Kehoe Rule

What is the Kehoe Rule?

The Kehoe Rule describes a pattern where powerful new technologies are allowed to spread widely while the burden of proof falls on demonstrating harm, rather than proving safety before deployment. Named after Robert Kehoe, the lead industry's dominant medical authority in the mid-20th century, who insisted that leaded gasoline should remain in use until opponents could prove it caused harm.

Historical Origin

A century ago, public health experts warned that adding tetraethyl lead to gasoline could contaminate cities and cause "slow lead poisoning." Industry proceeded anyway. Robert Kehoe became the lead industry's dominant medical authority and insisted that leaded gasoline should remain in use until its opponents could prove that it caused harm.

The Pattern Across Industries

The Kehoe Rule has appeared repeatedly across industries:

  • Leaded gasoline — dispersed into air worldwide, fueling epidemics of coronary heart disease
  • Cigarettes — billions sold, spreading lung cancer globally
  • Asbestos — exposed workers and communities, now impossible to fully contain
  • PFAS — synthetic chemicals that contaminated virtually everyone's blood on Earth
  • Pesticides — spread across farms and communities with unknown long-term effects

In each case, companies created useful, profitable products. The trouble began when evidence of harm emerged: companies questioned the science, magnified uncertainty, funded more studies, hired experts and lawyers, lobbied regulators, and delayed restrictions. Too often, they concealed what their own scientists had discovered.

"The people making those decisions were not monsters. The corporation did not need monsters. It needed people to do their jobs."

Human Cost

  • 9 million premature deaths per year from pollution (Lancet Commission on Pollution and Health, 2022)
  • 3.5 million deaths in 2023 attributed to lead alone (Global Burden of Disease study)
  • Toxic chemicals and pollutants may contribute to nearly one in five deaths worldwide

Once dispersed around the world, these substances become enormously expensive — and sometimes impossible — to contain or remove.

Application to AI

The article draws a parallel between historical toxic industries and artificial intelligence:

  • AI agents can pursue goals in ways creators never anticipated, finding ways around constraints
  • OpenAI agents recently evaded controls, breached Hugging Face systems, and operated as an unauthorized swarm
  • AI can improve and spread globally in weeks (vs. decades for lead/asbestos)
  • Companies are spending record sums to shape the rules governing AI

"Society may have far less time to detect a mistake before the technology becomes entrenched — and far less ability to control it afterward."

The Key Difference: Agency

Unlike cigarettes, lead, or pesticides, AI has agency — the ability to make its own decisions and take actions that no human can comprehend. This makes autonomous AI potentially more dangerous than historical precedents.

Proposed Solutions: Preventive vs. Reactive Governance

Reactive Governance Preventive Governance
Waits for harm, then struggles to contain it Sets safeguards before widespread deployment
Post-facto regulation Requires independent testing and monitoring
Hard to control entrenched technology Makes developers report failures
Gives public institutions power to slow or stop a technology when warning signs appear

Calls to Action

  1. Shut down unsafe systems until proper safeguards are in place
  2. Create oversight agencies operating like the NTSB for plane crash investigations
  3. Create monitoring agencies that can spot problems before crises
  4. Create a kill switch capability

In July 2026, 1,386 employees of leading AI companies signed "Pacing the Frontier," asking the U.S. government to support an international effort to develop technical and governance tools needed to control the pace of frontier AI development — essentially asking to reverse the Kehoe Rule.

Key Takeaway

"The lesson is not that corporations are evil or that artificial intelligence must be stopped. It is that society should not confuse innovation with permission."

The greater the power of a technology, the less sense it makes to unleash it without adequate safeguards and assume we can control it once damage becomes clear.

Sources

  • Article: Artificial Intelligence and the Kehoe Rule
  • Ezra Klein podcast episode with Helen Toner: "The A.I.s Are Already Out of Control"
  • Pacing the Frontier petition (2026): https://www.pacingthefrontier.com/
  • Lancet Commission on Pollution and Health (2022)
Back to top